mangalore today
Monday, December 05
Genesis Engineersnamename


Indian Bureaucracy’s Penchant for Grandiloquent and Intimidating Designations

Indian Bureaucracy’s Penchant for Grandiloquent and Intimidating Designations

Indian Bureaucracy’s Penchant for Grandiloquent and Intimidating Designations

Mangalore Today News Network

By Dr G ShreeKumar Menon

Manipal, August 9, 2019:
Our honourable Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi is reportedly engaged in an exercise to reform our bloated bureaucracy, and to make it people friendly. All government departments and the officers therein perform many different types of tasks of great importance to the citizens.  The government administration comprises a wide number of different public authorities and institutions each with a different relationship with the citizens.  For example, there is GST department that handles taxes, Police department that handles security related issues, and education department that deals with all educational institutions, educational policy, and, conduct of examinations and so on.  Common to all of these authorities and institutions is the unwritten rule that they must treat citizens in a competent, proper and considerate manner.All officials and employees are expected to observe good administrative practices when dealing with citizens, as they are an expression of how public authorities, institutions and employees should conduct themselves with regard to citizens. Public authorities, institutions and employees generally demonstrate good administrative practice when they display politeness, consideration and attention towards citizens and act in a way that strengthens trust in the public administration. However, it is very common to see officials displaying high-handed behaviour, rudeness, arrogance and disdain for the general public. This partly emanates from the high sounding designations that many officials flaunt. Designations show off the power, rank and hierarchical position of the officer. Officials tend to self-estimate their importance by the designations, this belief is reinforced by the supplicating behaviour of their subordinates. Public are often overawed into shock and submission by high-sounding designations.

Indian Bureaucracy

It is indeed the need of the hour for an A to Z transformation of the bureaucracy, starting with the intimidating designations found in each and every government office.The bureaucracy is still clinging on to archaic titles and designations that convey wrong notions about public administration, and government service. During the British era, titles and designations of government officials were meant to convey authoritarianism, brute power and, unfettered discretion in all matters. This warranted creation of grandiloquent designations that conveyed power and authority of all kinds. Hence the selection of designations like Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Chief Commissioner, Director General, Chief Secretary, Inspector General, Superintendent, Controller, Collector, and other similar high sounding words, which would invoke a certain kind of fear and dread in the minds of the common man. It is more than seventy years since the British left India, still our bureaucracy is clutching to these designations, which gives the officials heady notions of grandeur and authority over the common man.Is it not high time to make designations people friendly?

There are around 58 Ministries and 93 Departments in government of India, populated with thousands of officials flaunting high sounding designations in English language. Many designations when translated into Hindi and other regional languages, invariably carry the suffix “Adhikari” that denotes power.

The term ‘Public Servant’ encompasses all levels of government employees, from the highest to the lowest. Even the Legislature and the Judiciary are covered under the ambit of the term ‘Public Servant’. But, this term is hardly used in any government office. Instead, designations that create a climate of fear among the general public, is preferred. This also deludes the mind of the government official into forgetting that his salary and perks are paid by the tax payer. To quote Mortimer Zuckerman “Millions of public workers have become a kind of privileged new class - a new elite, who live better than their private sector counterparts. Public servants have become the public’s masters. No wonder the public is upset.” Any reform of the bureaucracy should first start with revamping of designations, and making them free of authoritarian terms, that denote an atmosphere of authority.The ‘public services’ aspect needs to be brought into the scope of every designation, in order to constantly remind the user of that designation that he is a ‘public servant’, first and foremost.

Government departments are rapidly transforming due to the advent of the digital era. Today, governance implies digital government, digital skills, data driven public sector, data governance and open government data. There is no scope for displaying authoritarianism when the system is rapidly transforming into digital mode, to become people friendly. Authoritarian designations and titles create psychological notions of power, authority and grandeur that inhibit an officer from being people friendly.  The private sector, especially the IT sector realised the irrelevance of designations and quickly switched over to soft titles like Director, Head, Group Leader, Team leader, analysts, project lead, consultant, technical support executives and so on. These are very soft titles and give a hint of the scope of the duty involved in that post.However the designations of public officials are yet to change, in order to be relevant to the changing times.

The government should initiate a move to adopt soft titles, eradicate high-sounding authoritarian designations, introduce parity in designations across all departments, and while putting up boards in  the reception area of each office that denote ‘List of Officers’, it should read as ‘List of Public Servants’. Media when reporting ‘news’ should make it a compulsory habit to use the term ‘Public Servant’ when reference is made to anybody, whether in the Legislature/Executive/ Judiciary. This would go a long way in making government departments citizen-friendly.


Dr sreekumar menonDr G Shreekumar Menon, IRS (Rtd) Ph.D. (Narcotics),
Former Director General
National Academy of Customs Excise and Narcotics,
& Multi-Disciplinary School Of Economic Intelligence, India,
Fellow, James Martin Center For Non Proliferation Studies, USA.
Public Administration, Maxwell School of Public Administration, Syracuse University, U.S.A.
AOTS Scholar, Japan
He can be reached at


Write Comment | E-Mail To a Friend | Facebook | Twitter | Print
Write your Comments on this Article
Your Name
Native Place / Place of Residence
Your E-mail
Your Comment
You have characters left.
Security Validation
Enter the characters in the image above