The court was hearing the Enforcement Directorate’s appeal against the Karnataka High Court quashing the proceedings against the CM’s wife and Suresh

Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/why-ed-being-used-for-political-battles-supreme-court-rejects-plea-against-siddaramaiahs-wife-in-muda-case-3639960
The court was hearing the Enforcement Directorate’s appeal against the Karnataka High Court quashing the proceedings against the CM’s wife and Suresh

Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/why-ed-being-used-for-political-battles-supreme-court-rejects-plea-against-siddaramaiahs-wife-in-muda-case-3639960
The court was hearing the ED’s appeal against the Karnataka High Court" />
mangalore today
name
name
name
Tuesday, July 22
namenamename

 

SC rejects ED’s plea against Siddaramaiah’s wife in MUDA case


Mangalore Today News Network

New Delhi, July 21, 2025: The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a plea by the Enforcement Directorate against the Karnataka High Court’s order quashing the criminal proceedings in a money laundering case against Chief Minister’s wife B M Parvathi arising out of Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam.

A bench of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and K Vinod Chandran expressed concern over the use of the Enforcement Directorate to serve political ends.


Siddaramaiah


"Let political battles be fought in the electorate. Why are you being used," the court asked Additional Solicitor General S V Raju.

"Please don’t ask us to open our mouth, otherwise, we will be forced to make some harsh comments about the ED," the bench further cautioned the law officer, who agreed to withdraw the special leave petition.

"We will withdraw but this should not be treated as a precedent," Raju said.

The Karnataka High Court had on March 7, 2025 quashed the alleged money laundering proceedings initiated against Parvathi and Urban Development Minister Byrathi Suresh by the Enforcement Directorate in connection with alleged illegal allotment of sites by the Mysuru Urban Development Authority.

Before the High Court, Parvathi had contended that she had surrendered the 14 sites, and that she was neither in possession of nor enjoying any ‘so-called proceeds of crime’.

She had questioned the haste with which the ED initiated proceedings under PMLA based on the FIR registered by the Lokayukta police on trial court’s order in the case of alleged illegality in allotment of sites to various persons by MUDA.

It is alleged that Siddaramaiah used his political influence to get compensation for 14 sites in the name of his wife Parvathi in lieu of three acres and 16 guntas of land acquired by the MUDA.

The land was originally acquired by MUDA for Rs 3.24 lakh. The compensation in the form of 14 sites at the posh Vijayanagar locality in Mysuru was worth approximately Rs 56 crore. Parvathi had subsequently returned those sites.

The opposition parties claimed the scam related to the allocation of compensatory sites by the MUDA was to the tune Rs 4,000 Cr.


Write Comment | E-Mail To a Friend | Facebook | Twitter | Print
Error:NULL
Write your Comments on this Article
Your Name
Native Place / Place of Residence
Your E-mail
Your Comment
You have characters left.
Security Validation
Enter the characters in the image above