llahabad High Court verdict on Ayodhya title suits out, Ramlala idol not to be removed from disputed site in Ayodhya | Disputed site to be divided into three parts..." />
mangalore today
name
name
name
Saturday, April 20
Genesis Engineersnamename

 

Ayodhya verdict: Ramlala idol not to be removed, Disputed site to be divided into three parts

Ayodhya verdict: Ramlala idol not to be removed, Disputed site to be divided into three parts


Mangalore Today News Network

Allahabad, September 30: Allahabad High Court verdict on Ayodhya title suits out, Ramlala idol not to be removed from disputed site in Ayodhya. The ownership of the disputed site is to be divided into three parts: the site of the Ram lala idol to Ram, Nirmohi Akhara gets Sita Rasoi and Ram Chabutara, Sunni Wakf Board gets the rest. Justice D V Sharma decrees the title suit in favour of Hindus, say lawyer K N Bhatt, who represented the party on behalf of ’Ram Lalla’.

 

AYODHYA


Sixty years after it first went to court, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has pronounced verdict on the Ayodhya title suit.

Senior advocate and BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad emerged from court today to say that the three-judge bench had ruled in a majority judgement 2:1, that one-third part of the disputed land should be given to the Sunni Waqf Board, one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the party for ’Ram Lalla’. Prasad represents one of the litigants.

Ravi Shankar Prasad claimed the court had ruled that the place where the idol of Ram was kept was the birthplace of the deity and the idols should not removed.

Prasad claimed that the court had asked for a status quo for three months and in that time the litigants had to decide how to split the party.


Litigants emerged from the courtroom with copies of the judgment and there has been chaos outside the Lucknow court ever since.

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court comprising Justice S U Khan, Justice Sudhir Agarwal and Justice D V Sharma, delivered the judgement today.

The dispute at hand is about whether the 2.7 acres of disputed land on which the Babri Masjid stood before it was demolished on December 6, 1992, belongs to the Sunni Central Waqf Board or to the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha.

It has been a protracted legal battle, and people across the country have spoken in one voice on the need to maintain peace and harmony irrespective of the verdict.


The Trio Behind the Ayodhya Ruling

The three judges - two Hindus and a Muslim - of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court who Thursday authored the long-awaited verdict on the Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi dispute are Justice Dharam Veer Sharma 62, who retires on Oct 1, 2010 after pronouncing the most important verdict of his life, Justice Sudhir Agarwal, 52 and Justice Sibghat Ullah Khan, 58.

More details click on http://rjbm.nic.in/


Write Comment | E-Mail | Facebook | Twitter | Print
Error:NULL
Write your Comments on this Article
Your Name
Native Place / Place of Residence
Your E-mail
Your Comment
You have characters left.
Security Validation
Enter the characters in the image above