Rebel MLAs extend olive branch to BJP central leadership

Mtoday news

Bangalore, Oct 20 : Appearing to soften their stand for the first time since they triggered a crisis for BJP’s first government in the South, rebel party MLAs today offered to talk to central leadership but are firm on replacement of Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa, calling him ’’corrupt’’. 

The offer came even as the new single judge bench of the high court today adjourned to tomorrow the hearing on the petitions by the rebel MLAs, who contended that the Speaker’s order was vitiated and perverse and their action (withdrawing support) did not attract provisions of anti-defection law.


Beleaguered Yeddyurappa, meanwhile, rejected opposition demand for seeking a fresh mandate and asked them to wait for two-and-half years for the government to complete its term.
"If (BJP President) Nitin Gadkari calls us, we are ready to discuss," former Minister Balachandra L Jarkiholi, a leader of 11 dissident BJP MLAs, who have withdrawn support to the party government threatening its survival, told reporters here.
"We are in BJP, our fight is against the leadership," said Jarkiholi, flanked by some other rebel BJP MLAs, who have challenged in the Karnataka High Court their disqualification by the Assembly Speaker K G Bopaiah.

 

Speaker’s order ’perverse’, rebel MLAs tell HC

 

Eleven rebel BJP MLAs today told the Karnataka High Court that the Speaker’s order disqualifying them was ’’vitiated’’ and ’’perverse’’ and their action did not attract relevant provisions of the anti- defection law. 


In their contention before a new single judge bench, which adjourned the hearing till tomorrow, the MLAs said Speaker K G Bopaiah’s action was based on "conjectures and surmises" rather than any "cogent and clinching material".
The rebels, whose withdrawal of support to the BJP’s first-ever government in the south pushed it into a crisis, said their action did not attract the provisions of para 2 (1) (a) of the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution that deals with disqualification of members of a legislature.


Asserting that the Speaker’s order was not based on any circumstantial evidence which was "clinching and cogent", they told the court, "The Speaker has relied not on material on record but on surmises and conjectures".

"It does not make out a case for disqualification. The Speaker should have ascertained the material on record first. What is required is proof beyond reasonable doubt, not mere preponderance," senior counsel B V Acharya, appearing for two of the BJP MLAs, submitted.

"They (the 11 MLAs) have never told the governor (H R Bhardwaj) that they supported any other government or any political party."


The counsel for the 11 BJP MLAs made the submission when their petitions came up for hearing before a single judge, Justice V G Sabhahith, to whom the case was referred after a split verdict by a division bench, comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice N Kumar on Monday.

Khehar had upheld the Speaker’s order disqualifying the 11 MLAs while Justice Kumar set it aside.Justice Sabhahith, who heard the case today, adjourned further hearing for tomorrow.

Counsel K G Raghavan, appearing for one of the rebel MLAs, submitted they had only expressed dissent which is ingrained in the Tenth schedule of the Constitution.
Referring to the BJP MLAs’ October 6 letter to the governor withdrawing support to the B S Yeddyurappa government, the counsel said, "It is an honest expression of an anguish in a manner known to law and the contention of the Speaker that this has a reference to Article 356 of the Constitution has no substance."

All that the 11 BJP MLAs have said was that they don’t want a government headed by the "corrupt" chief minister. Their contention was that they are ready to support any BJP government...any leader other than Yeddyurappa.

"There is not even a remote suggestion that we do not want a BJP government". 
On the chief minister’s contention in his petition before the Speaker that the 11 MLAs expressing lack of confidence in him tantamount to voluntarily leaving the party, the rebel legislators denied the charge and said their aim was only to salvage the image of the party and the state.